People Living With Cancer

Published Works: Metastatic Bone Disease


Introduction
Virtually every cancer has the potential to metastasize. Following metastases to nodes, lung, and liver, the skeleton is the fourth most common site for metastases. Over the past several decades, an increase in the survival of patients with bone metastases has been achieved through earlier detection using improved diagnostic modalities and radiographic imaging techniques and through treatment advances in chemotherapy regimens and radiation therapy combined with better surgical approaches.

Skeletal Metastases
Skeletal metastases represent the major orthopedic complication of failed cancer treatment and are commonly associated with disabling pain and pathological fracture. Treatment of all patients with metastatic disease involves a multidisciplinary team approach to include an oncologist, Radiotherapist, and orthopedic surgeon. Advances in surgical techniques and internal fixation modalities have resulted in great improvement in pain control and management of patients with skeletal metastases. The main goals of treatment are to relieve pain, to improve function, and to return patients, as soon as possible, to their previous environment.

The vast majority of skeletal cancers are of metastatic origin rather than primary bone tumors. In most cases metastatic lesions are multifocal and show variable radiographic features, while primary bone tumors demonstrate a typical presentation by their anatomic site and radiographic features. The surgical approach for primary bone tumor is curative by wide surgical resection, while for metastatic disease surgical approach is palliative to restore function and to relieve pain. In most instances of skeletal metastatic disease, the best treatment may not appreciably extend the life span of the patient.

Within the skeleton the site of a metastatic lesion can be correlated with the activity of the bone marrow The axial skeleton contains active hematopoietic marrow, while the peripheral skeleton contains relatively avascular fatty marrow. The axial skeleton, especially the thoracolumbar spine, represents the most common site for metastases. Because of the relatively avascular marrow, metastases below the elbow and knee are relatively rare. Many of these lesions are asymptomatic and are too small to be recognized radiographically. The proximal femur was found to be the site of metastatic lesions in 11 percent of all patients; however, when involved, they are often likely to fracture. About 40 percent of all pathologic fractures occur in the proximal femur. The risk of pathologic fracture is correlated to the extent of the lesion, the type of destruction, and the anatomic location. Lesions in high stress areas such as the lesser trochanter are very often associated with subsequent pathologic fracture. In particular highly anaplastic and rapidly growing vascular lesions, which are usually osteolytic, are associated with a high risk of fracture.

Metastatic lesions that result in a net loss of bone are described as osteolytic, as can be seen in myeloma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. When the process involves bone formation as observed in metastatic prostate carcinoma, the net increase in bone results in blastic, sclerotic lesions. In cases in which there are lytic and blastic areas, as can be seen in some metastatic breast carcinomas, lesions are described radiographically as a mixed osteolytic osteoblastic type. The mechanism of bone resorption is primarily osteoclast-mediated. Several known osteoclastic stimulating factors associated with cancer play a significant role in the process of bone resorption.

Pathogenesis of Metastes
Despite the fact that tumors originate from a single cell that lacks normal control mechanisms, tumors consist of vast numbers of cells that are not homogeneous. Only a limited number of cells may have the genetic potential to metastasize. Although numerous tumor cells gain access to the systemic circulation, only a small number of cells, probably less than 0.1 percent, survive the transport. While random sites of metastasis can occur, selectivity of the metastatic site depends on adhesion of molecules specific to the endothelium within the arterioles, capillaries, and postcapillary venules of particular organs. Complementary molecules characteristic of individual tumor types are permissive for attachment to the specific endothelium, initiating the metastatic cascade. Organ selectivity has been demonstrated in mice by the propensity of harvested metastatic tumor to return, after sequential transplantation, to the organ from which it had been harvested. The differential frequency with which human cancers metastasize to bone presumably represents the interaction between adhesion molecules on vascular endothelium of the skeleton and the tumor cell.

Patient Evaluation and Diagnostic Work-Up
Treatment of patients with metastatic disease requires a multidisciplinary team approach, including the oncologist radiotherapist and orthopaedic oncologist. Patients should be carefully analyzed based on the type of the tumor, anatomical location and neurologic status. The diagnostic work-up needs to address and resolve the following questions:

1. Is the lesion solitary or multifocal? The majority of patients with bone metastases present with bone pain. Technetium bone scanning is a good modality with which identify occult lesions that are still asymptomatic. In relative to the cancellous portion of the bone over 40% of bone destruction is needed before a skeletal lesion is usually identified radiographically. When cortical bone is destroyed, however, a lesser degree of destruction is needed for radiographic detection. A positive bone scan indicate Mineralization as a result of osteoblastic activity. Lesions with insignificant osteoblastic activity, such as myeloma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, the bone scan may be uninformative. The pattern of skeletal lesion distribution as can be visualized with bone scans is easily recognized and highly characteristic for skeletal metastases.

2. What is the intraosseous and extraosseous extension of the tumor? Computed tomography (CT) scan is helpful in assessing the size and extent of the bony destruction, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the best modality to assess the extent of the marrow and soft tissue extension. Malignant lymphoma may show minimal bone destruction on plain radiography while MRI may demonstrate a large soft tissue involvement.

3. What is the risk of pathological fracture? Lytic processes such as metastatic thyroid, renal cell, lung carcinoma, and malignant lymphoma involving the extremities are prone to fracture. The site of biopsy should be selected very carefully. These patients must be protected, bracing partial weight-bearing with crutches.

4. How vascular is the tumor?
Highly vascular tumor such as metastatic renal cell carcinoma could be associated with uncontrolled excessive bleeding from a small open biopsy. In such cases, arteriogram embolization should be considered preoperatively.

5. Does the tumor involve the adjacent joint? With joint involvement consideration of resection and joint replacement should be considered.

6. Is there a lung metastases?
A chest CT scan is done to support treatment planning. The extent of the surgical procedure will be dependent on the overall prognosis.

7. Is it a primary tumor or metastatic tumor?
The type of surgery performed is dependent on the result of the open biopsy. In primary tumor attempts eradicate on of the entire tumor is the goal, while in metastatic tumors the purpose of surgery is to avoid pathological fracture and to eliminate pain.

8. Is there a need for adjuvant therapy radiation, chemotherapy? Prior to any surgical consideration, the oncologist and radiation therapist should assess patients. Some patients may be successfully treated by radiotherapy alone with dramatic diminishment of pain. In others, patients combined treatment by radiation therapy and internal fixation may be required.

Surgical Management
Surgical treatment should be individualized to each patient's medical circumstance and with consideration to the anticipated impact on longevity. Good judgement and considerable experience are necessary in the selection of patients for surgery The patient's general condition must allow the surgical procedure to be performed with reasonable expectation that the patient will survive long enough to benefit from the surgery. Patients should also be informed and prepared prior to surgery concerning realistic expectations regarding relevant issues such as functional recovery, longevity and cure. Preoperatvely patient should be evaluated and treated for dehydration, coagulopaties, anemia, hypercalcemia of malignancy.

The primary goals of treatment of patients with painful skeletal metastatic lesions are to relieve pain, restore function to allow early mobilization and to ease nursing care. It is prudent to intervene electively for impending fracture. Pathological fracture seems to be associated with an increased incidence of subsequent pulmonary metastases. Prophylactic fixation may reduce the incidence of lung metastases Small lesions that do not present with an impending fracture and are radiosensitive can be treated by radiotherapy alone to relieve pain. Radiation may cause hyperemia at the periphery of treated bone with temporary softening, which may increase the risk of fracture. In lesion that may progress to impending fracture, blind intramedullary nailing with local irradiation may give good local control with pain relief. Irradiated pathological fractures that lack rigid fixation show a higher rate of nonunion. In a larger osteolytic lesion, blind intramedullary nailing may not be sufficient due to mechanical failure and telescoping migration of the bone fragments. In such cases, intramedullary nailing supplemented by methyl methacrylate to fill the defect may give the required fixation. In a significant number of patients with extensive destruction affecting the joint, such as these with hip, or knee joint segmental resection, prosthetic replacement may be indicated to allow immediate full weight-bearing. The nature of metastatic cancer and the often poor long-term survival generally makes long-term durability of the prosthesis unimportant.

The most common metastatic tumors arise from carcinoma of the breast, a tumor which accounts for more than 50 percent of the cases requiring orthopedic intervention, followed by cancers of the lung, kidney, prostate, GI tract, thyroid, and other miscellaneous sites. In-patients. who present with metastatic cancer of unknown primary site, the presence of bone metastases represents a sign of advanced disease with poor life expectancy.

Metastatic Tumors to the Acetabulum
Metastatic lesions to the acetabulum should be worked-up with CT scan for better evaluation of the extent of the lesion and to provide a guideline for the surgical approach. Small metastatic lesions to the acetabulum may be managed by radiation alone. Larger lesions can be treated by intralesional curettage and cement packing followed by local irradiation. Hip joints which suffer extensive destruction and erosion should be replaced by Endoprosthesis.

Metastatic Lesions to the Femur
Metastatic lesions to the femoral neck are best treated by a bipolar prosthesis. Metastatic disease to the trochanteric region can be treated by intralesional curettage and cement packing, supplemented by pin and plate fixation In cases with pathologic fracture, proximal femur replacement may be indicated. Impending fractures of the femoral shaft are best treated by closed intramedullary nailing. In cases with a large bony defect, augmentation by a cement spacer to prevent telescoping may achive a good result. Metastatic disease to the femoral condyle may be treated by intralesional curettage and cement packing. In those cases where there is pathologic fracture, distal femur replacement may be indicated.

Metastatic Lesions to the Scapula and Upper Extremity
Conservative treatment for pathologic fracture of the humerus is often associated with persistent pain and shoulder stiffness. To provide immediate pain relief and restore shoulder mobility, internal fixation is recommended. Metastatic lesion to the scapula can be treated by partial or total scapulectomy. Pathologic fracture of the humeral head is best managed by Endoprosthesis replacement. In fractures of the humeral shaft blind intramedullary nailing is the acceptable approach. In those cases with large defects, the fixation should be augmented by methyl methacrylate. Radiation can be delivered 2 weeks after surgery. Metastatic lesions of the radius and ulna are best stabilized by an intramedullary pin.

Metastatic Lesions to the Spine
The vertebral bodies are the most common site for metastatic lesions. Most vertebral metastases initially are occult and painless. The majority can be detected on routine bone scan. Metastatic lesions that do not compromise stability may remain asymptomatic. Pain typically occurs when a significant amount of bone destruction, has occurred leading to microfractures. Pathologic fractures of the vertebral bodies are of a compressive type and are usually stable. Patients with metastatic disease to the spine commonly develop back pain before any neurologic sequelae. MRI scan has essentially replaced myelography as the method of choice to demonstrate local extension and extradural compression. Spinal cord compression at the level of the thoracic spine can cause hyperreflexia and spasticity with complete paraplegia. A radiosensitive metastatic condition, such as lymphoma, may be treated effectively by irradiation therapy. Surgical decompression may be indicated in those patients who do not respond to radiation therapy, and subsequently develop neurologic deterioration. Surgical treatment for metastatic conditions to the spine has improved significantly with the introduction of new surgical techniques and instrumentation. The result of anterior spinal decompression with vertebral body resection, replacement by a cement spacer, and bracing has proved to be very effective in stabilizing the spine and preventing further neurologic deterioration.

Hypercalcemia of Malignancy
Hypercalcemia associated with skeletal metastases is a common metabolic complication and a life-threatening disorder. The clinical symptoms associated with hypercalcemia are weakness, nausea, vomiting, dehydration, polyuria, anorexia, lethargy, confusion, stupor, and coma. Hypercalcemia is most commonly associated with myeloma or carcinoma of the breast, but it may also occur with renal, ovarian, and lung cancers, as well as other neoplasms. Hypercalcemia is related to the capacity of the tumor to secrete specific hypercalcemic factors and usually not to increased intestinal absorption of calcium. The two major mechanisms for cancer-related hypercalcemia are local osteolytic factors and systemic factors. The local osteolytic factors cause osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and destruction. Tumor cells and inflammatory cells produce osteoclast-activating factors including cytokines such as interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factors, transforming growth factors, and prostaglandin. Hypercalcemia in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma is most commonly associated with widespread skeletal disease. Multiple myeloma is associated with extensive bone destruction often leading to bone pain, pathologic fracture, and hypercalcemia.

Systemic factors for hypercalcemia may be unassociated with localized bone disease. This condition is characterized by the production of circulating hypercalcemic factors, the tumor being the secretary gland and the target organ being the Osteoclasts in the skeleton. The clinical syndrome is due to the production of parathyroid-like hormone (PTH). Systemic PTH-like mediated hypercalcemia is common in Squamous cell carcinoma, and renal, bladder, and ovary carcinoma.

Occasionally, patients with various types of lymphomas develop hypercalcemia, the pathogenesis of which is not fully characterized. In part, the condition could be related to the production of bone-resorbing lymphokines by the lymphoid cells. In some patients, hypercalcemia could be related to increased 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D produced by lymphoid cells, and in these cases is likely associated with increased intestinal absorption of calcium. Myeloma cells produce cytokines that activate osteoclastic bone resorption.

Treatment of hypercalcemia should include restoration of intravascular volume by saline infusion to correct dehydration and to increase urinary excretion of calcium. Dietary restriction of calcium plays a small role only in those patients who have increased intestinal absorption. Calcium and vitamin D supplements should be discontinued. After the blood volume has been restored, administration of bisphosphonate such as pamidronate or etidronate inhibits osteoclastic bone activation. Calcitonin, which also inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and enhances urinary calcium excretion, may be useful for emergencies.

Previous Page



Copyright © 2012 Musculo-Skeletal Tumor Orthopaedic Practice | Disclaimer
Last Modified: July 30, 2003